A Golden Triangle indeed
This is apropos of nothing, really, other than more evidence that I have much too much time on my hands. Also, nothing funny here, except my attempts at armchair scholarship:
As Thailand's southern provinces are increasingly fraught with Islamist separatist "tensions" -- I love that word, such a bland descriptor for indiscriminate bombings and, for example, the recent beheading of a clothing vendor while he sat having tea in a cafe -- I have been thinking about Islam and sex. More specifically, about the Islamic obsession with it, and the fact that -- I believe, without any supporting evidence -- that this obsession is one of the core reasons for the current Islamic hostility to Western values. After all, if you are willing to flog or decapitate a woman for prostitution or even being alone in the company of an unrelated man, even the tepid sexuality of a "Friends" episode beamed via sattelite is going to be very alarming (on this score generally, I recommend Benjamin Barber's Jihad vs. McWorld, although the Amazon reader reviews are reasonably uneven).
My thoughts are arrived at via a stripper at a friend's bachelor party and the shy brother of the bride. As a good stripper, she knew she was supposed to lavish some plurality of her attention on him. Being none too worldly and freshly wed himself, though, he was obviously embarassed. And so, as she crabwalked naked towards him across a large table -- and he kept looking every possible way but at her oh-so obvious vagina -- she sought to palliate this strategy of humilation with these unexpectedly memorable words:
"Don't worry, honey, it's only geometry."
And she was spot on, though perhaps her use of "only" is where she went astray. Because math, it turns out, is pivotal to our sense of the erotic. Research shows that, both historically and cross culturally, the ideals of female beauty have in common a waist-hip ratio of .70, with other key factors being bust proportionality and bilateral symmetry. The details, obviously, vary infinitely as to time and place, but the ratios and the primacy accorded symmetry and proportionality have remained suprisingly consistent templates.
And while the only images of Islam in the West are currently either a shapeless woman in a black shift or a frenzied lunatic wielding a katanah, the fact is that, historically, Islam has produced among the most consistently innovative mathematical scholars. Indeed, such scholars were profoundly instrumental in establishing the disciplines of geometry and algrebra, with one author calling Islamic scholars "indisputably the founders of plane and spherical trigonometry." And what is sexual attraction other than the most, um, well, naked expression of "plane and spherical trigonometry? (Irvine Welsh once referred to the rhetorical question as the tool of trade for "burds and psychos," to which I will add the under-researched).
But Islamic math was not plain old utilitarian math, simply designed to get their spice ships to Damascus all the faster. Rather, it was math steeped in, and indeed fundamentally informed by, religious belief. As one (admittedly uncompelling) scholar puts it:
"Although the shapes and structures are based on the geometry of Euclid and other Greek mathematicians, Islamic artists used them to create visual statements about religious ideas.
One explanation of this practice was that Mohammad had warned against the worship of idols; this prohibition was understood as a commandment against representation of human or animal forms. Geometric forms were an acceptable substitute for the proscribed forms.
An even more important reason is that geometric systems and Islamic religious values, though expressed in different forms, say similar things about universal values. In Islamic art, infinitely repeating patterns represent the unchanging laws of God. Moslems are expected to observe strict rules of behavior exactly as they were orginally set forth by Mohammad in the seventh century. These rules are known as the "Pillars of Faith":
1) pronouncing the creed (chantingan affirmation of the existence of one God and that God is Allah)
2) praying, in a precisely defined ritual of words and motions, five times a day
3) giving alms
4) fasting during the month of Ramadan (time varies according to lunar calendar)
5) making, during a lifetime, at least one pilgramage to the city of Mecca in Arabia
The strict rules for construction of geometric patterns provide a visual analogy to religious rules of behavior." http://www.askasia.org/frclasrm/lessplan/l000030.htm
So my thought is this: perhaps much of the Islamic attitude towards sex, however overlaid with sharia and its attendant protocol, derives from a deep and abiding attunement to the inextricable intertwining of the erotic and the divine in the geometric and algebraic. Under such a theory, viewing women as the apotheosis of that juncture is compelled by the twin logics of religion and biology. And this, in some ways, is not without parallel in its brother religion of Judaism; the same way that Jews keep their Torah scrolls not only locked in the ark but typically clothed as well -- allowed to be naked and examined only in accordance with strict rules and strict adherence to the protocol derived from those rules -- maybe it is in precisely the same impulse that leads Islam to keep its women so tightly under wraps. Hell, as long as I am speculating out my butt, I'll go even further and posit that Judaism is a religion that valorizes language, while Islam is a religion that valorizes form, but that parallel beliefs and practices have sprung about those objects of valorization.
This might not be so wacky; after all, Jews kabbahlistically plumb the depths of the Torah -- its words -- in search of mathematical order that will reveal the will if not the face of God; perhaps Islam already knows it sleeps next to it every night.
In other words -- without in any way endorsing the subjugation of women -- perhaps we can at least recognize, if not a legitimacy, at least an understandability, to the Islamic attitude towards women and sex. One worthy at least of thoughtful consideration and interrogation, rather than either the insincere pieties of "to each his own"-ism or the "whattabunchanutjobs" approaches that hallmark most public discussion of the issue.
It would definitely -- def.in.ite.ly. -- help if I knew what I was talking about.
Will somebody smarter and better informed than me let me know if I'm on to anything at all here?
As Thailand's southern provinces are increasingly fraught with Islamist separatist "tensions" -- I love that word, such a bland descriptor for indiscriminate bombings and, for example, the recent beheading of a clothing vendor while he sat having tea in a cafe -- I have been thinking about Islam and sex. More specifically, about the Islamic obsession with it, and the fact that -- I believe, without any supporting evidence -- that this obsession is one of the core reasons for the current Islamic hostility to Western values. After all, if you are willing to flog or decapitate a woman for prostitution or even being alone in the company of an unrelated man, even the tepid sexuality of a "Friends" episode beamed via sattelite is going to be very alarming (on this score generally, I recommend Benjamin Barber's Jihad vs. McWorld, although the Amazon reader reviews are reasonably uneven).
My thoughts are arrived at via a stripper at a friend's bachelor party and the shy brother of the bride. As a good stripper, she knew she was supposed to lavish some plurality of her attention on him. Being none too worldly and freshly wed himself, though, he was obviously embarassed. And so, as she crabwalked naked towards him across a large table -- and he kept looking every possible way but at her oh-so obvious vagina -- she sought to palliate this strategy of humilation with these unexpectedly memorable words:
"Don't worry, honey, it's only geometry."
And she was spot on, though perhaps her use of "only" is where she went astray. Because math, it turns out, is pivotal to our sense of the erotic. Research shows that, both historically and cross culturally, the ideals of female beauty have in common a waist-hip ratio of .70, with other key factors being bust proportionality and bilateral symmetry. The details, obviously, vary infinitely as to time and place, but the ratios and the primacy accorded symmetry and proportionality have remained suprisingly consistent templates.
And while the only images of Islam in the West are currently either a shapeless woman in a black shift or a frenzied lunatic wielding a katanah, the fact is that, historically, Islam has produced among the most consistently innovative mathematical scholars. Indeed, such scholars were profoundly instrumental in establishing the disciplines of geometry and algrebra, with one author calling Islamic scholars "indisputably the founders of plane and spherical trigonometry." And what is sexual attraction other than the most, um, well, naked expression of "plane and spherical trigonometry? (Irvine Welsh once referred to the rhetorical question as the tool of trade for "burds and psychos," to which I will add the under-researched).
But Islamic math was not plain old utilitarian math, simply designed to get their spice ships to Damascus all the faster. Rather, it was math steeped in, and indeed fundamentally informed by, religious belief. As one (admittedly uncompelling) scholar puts it:
"Although the shapes and structures are based on the geometry of Euclid and other Greek mathematicians, Islamic artists used them to create visual statements about religious ideas.
One explanation of this practice was that Mohammad had warned against the worship of idols; this prohibition was understood as a commandment against representation of human or animal forms. Geometric forms were an acceptable substitute for the proscribed forms.
An even more important reason is that geometric systems and Islamic religious values, though expressed in different forms, say similar things about universal values. In Islamic art, infinitely repeating patterns represent the unchanging laws of God. Moslems are expected to observe strict rules of behavior exactly as they were orginally set forth by Mohammad in the seventh century. These rules are known as the "Pillars of Faith":
1) pronouncing the creed (chantingan affirmation of the existence of one God and that God is Allah)
2) praying, in a precisely defined ritual of words and motions, five times a day
3) giving alms
4) fasting during the month of Ramadan (time varies according to lunar calendar)
5) making, during a lifetime, at least one pilgramage to the city of Mecca in Arabia
The strict rules for construction of geometric patterns provide a visual analogy to religious rules of behavior." http://www.askasia.org/frclasrm/lessplan/l000030.htm
So my thought is this: perhaps much of the Islamic attitude towards sex, however overlaid with sharia and its attendant protocol, derives from a deep and abiding attunement to the inextricable intertwining of the erotic and the divine in the geometric and algebraic. Under such a theory, viewing women as the apotheosis of that juncture is compelled by the twin logics of religion and biology. And this, in some ways, is not without parallel in its brother religion of Judaism; the same way that Jews keep their Torah scrolls not only locked in the ark but typically clothed as well -- allowed to be naked and examined only in accordance with strict rules and strict adherence to the protocol derived from those rules -- maybe it is in precisely the same impulse that leads Islam to keep its women so tightly under wraps. Hell, as long as I am speculating out my butt, I'll go even further and posit that Judaism is a religion that valorizes language, while Islam is a religion that valorizes form, but that parallel beliefs and practices have sprung about those objects of valorization.
This might not be so wacky; after all, Jews kabbahlistically plumb the depths of the Torah -- its words -- in search of mathematical order that will reveal the will if not the face of God; perhaps Islam already knows it sleeps next to it every night.
In other words -- without in any way endorsing the subjugation of women -- perhaps we can at least recognize, if not a legitimacy, at least an understandability, to the Islamic attitude towards women and sex. One worthy at least of thoughtful consideration and interrogation, rather than either the insincere pieties of "to each his own"-ism or the "whattabunchanutjobs" approaches that hallmark most public discussion of the issue.
It would definitely -- def.in.ite.ly. -- help if I knew what I was talking about.
Will somebody smarter and better informed than me let me know if I'm on to anything at all here?
